Explanation and Free Practice Resources
Comparing two valid strategies involves analyzing how each represents quantities and relationships, why each leads to the same correct result, and which is more efficient, transparent, or adaptable for a given problem. This reasoning applies to multi-step problems involving whole-number, decimal, and fraction operations, ratios, and simple expressions or equations, while distinguishing equivalent methods from procedures that merely appear plausible; it does not require formal proof of generalized algorithms or abstract optimization.
On this page:
To compare two valid strategies, first solve the problem in two different ways. Then explain:
Example: A jacket costs 4825%$6$ is added for shipping. What is the total cost?
A discount means subtract of the original price.
Convert to a decimal:
Find the discount:
The discount is 12$. Subtract it from the original price:
Now add the shipping cost:
The total cost is:
This strategy represents the amount being taken away from the original price.
If is taken off, then remains.
Convert to a decimal:
Find of the original price:
Then add the shipping cost:
The total cost is:
This strategy represents the part of the price that remains after the discount.
Both strategies are valid because:
Strategy 2 is a little more efficient because it uses one multiplication instead of finding the discount and then subtracting. However, Strategy 1 may be more transparent when you want to know exactly how much money was saved.
When comparing strategies, look for whether each operation represents the quantities in the problem—not just whether the final answers happen to match.
Click a topic below to practice the foundational skills you'll need, learn the steps, or master this skill
Earned ?
Print this free 'Compare two valid strategies' worksheet to practice this skill away from the computer. Click 'Modify' to easily customize this worksheet to your exact needs.
These adaptive units introduce, teach, or reinforce this skill (Compare two valid strategies) through scaffolded problems that grow in difficulty as concepts are understood.